Today while sitting in Advanced Online Media, I had the sudden feeling that I hadn't learned one useful damn thing this whole time I've been in college! I became angry, I mean I'm listening to a visiting professor talk about things we should, but dont know about? WTF? Why am I paying so much darn money to learn 1/3 of what I have to know to compete? And when I say compete, I also mean globally. Why am I sitting in 400-level classes unaware of basics? Why are most of my professors suddenly ex-reporters or camera men? Why are my textbooks costing more than a down payment on a Ford Focus? "Required" Textbooks that professors write, barely get cracked open and then are "discontinued" so you only get $4 back if anything? Why is tuition constantly going up? Why am I so afraid that I don't know what I'm supposed to know? Why do I feel like my university sign should have a -Mart ending? You know, like ASU-Mart, or UofM-Mart?
Why do I feel like I'm on an assembly line like a 5 ft. tall Mrs. Potato Head with people attaching parts to me that they think I should have, but the parts are always mis-matched so when it's time to come out of the box all of my fake, half-heartedly placed attachments will fall right off because they weren't carefully considered if it was a good fit or observed or placed with care in mind.
I'm out.
Thursday, February 24, 2011
College; The New Big Business
Posted by
Introducing those who want things to happen to those who can MAKE things happen!
at
5:18 AM
No comments:
Labels: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow
big business,
college campus elections,
expensive textbooks,
Mrs. Potato Head,
tuition hikes,
university
Thursday, January 13, 2011
I Don't Want A Man-Boy!
Listen up. According to statistics in this country, I may never get married. I don't pay attention to those statistics, but I do pay attention to the reason that could happen; Man-Boys.
If you don't know what a Man-Boy is, then you probably are one of them or putting up with one.
I'm a woman of a certain age. I grew up with my grandfather telling me how beautiful I was and all the great things little girls need to hear, so a Man-Boy telling me I'm beautiful is a compliment, but not a ticket to ride.
Correction, a Man-Boy doesn't use the word 'beautiful,' he uses words like "sexy" and "hot" or compliment a body part.
If you cannot dress like a grown man, don't even approach! Cornrows, while nice for some, is not something I care for in a grown man as well as; sagging pants, sneakers, jerseys, baseball caps, gold teeth, no job, living at home with mom, no car, wannabe rapper or promoter, plays video games, swears a lot, can't look me in the eyes, lying, clubbing, drinking/drugs, felon, not educated, never wants to be held accountable and of course only brings his dick to "the table."
When did so many men decide to be triflin? Why do they think we're supposed to accept that?
I recently had a "scare" with a Man-Boy. It didn't take long (One Week) to figure out that I had a loser on my hands. This Man-Boy wasn't very good at communicating and when I say that, I mean he never called, would only text me and always had an excuse. Excuse me, but I went through that in the 9th grade, so you know what? Unh-unh!
Man-Boys need not apply. I don't have a problem with being single because I'm okay with me and I'm not going to roll it in powdered sugar because it sucks at times, but the peace I have is better than the drama a Man-Boy brings any day!
Maybe I won't ever get married, but since when does that validate my entire existence? I'll never lower my standards Man-Boy, so you better man up.
If you don't know what a Man-Boy is, then you probably are one of them or putting up with one.
I'm a woman of a certain age. I grew up with my grandfather telling me how beautiful I was and all the great things little girls need to hear, so a Man-Boy telling me I'm beautiful is a compliment, but not a ticket to ride.
Correction, a Man-Boy doesn't use the word 'beautiful,' he uses words like "sexy" and "hot" or compliment a body part.
If you cannot dress like a grown man, don't even approach! Cornrows, while nice for some, is not something I care for in a grown man as well as; sagging pants, sneakers, jerseys, baseball caps, gold teeth, no job, living at home with mom, no car, wannabe rapper or promoter, plays video games, swears a lot, can't look me in the eyes, lying, clubbing, drinking/drugs, felon, not educated, never wants to be held accountable and of course only brings his dick to "the table."
When did so many men decide to be triflin? Why do they think we're supposed to accept that?
I recently had a "scare" with a Man-Boy. It didn't take long (One Week) to figure out that I had a loser on my hands. This Man-Boy wasn't very good at communicating and when I say that, I mean he never called, would only text me and always had an excuse. Excuse me, but I went through that in the 9th grade, so you know what? Unh-unh!
Man-Boys need not apply. I don't have a problem with being single because I'm okay with me and I'm not going to roll it in powdered sugar because it sucks at times, but the peace I have is better than the drama a Man-Boy brings any day!
Maybe I won't ever get married, but since when does that validate my entire existence? I'll never lower my standards Man-Boy, so you better man up.
Posted by
Introducing those who want things to happen to those who can MAKE things happen!
at
2:32 AM
No comments:
Labels: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow
losers,
Man-Boy,
sorry ass men,
triflin men
Tuesday, November 16, 2010
The 'L' Word.
How many times have we heard it? "I Love You." How many times did we actually feel loved? Really?
I don't hate love and I'm not a cynic. I believe in love, but not that false love that weakens the actual word and meaning.
That word, diluted down to "love-flavored juice," slips too easily from our lips now. We use it an excuse, a shield, a distraction and we abuse it so much that when you hear it you automatically think, "yeah, right."
What happened to it? The word I mean. When did we start abusing that word? When did we start to believe that using it was a sign of weakness or for opportunity purposes only? When did the 'L' word become the doppleganger for destruction?
We only get so many real "I Love You-s" in this life, why waste them on games and deception?
Something is truly wrong when someone tells you they love you and you don't reciprocate, but instead, go numb. A friend told me, "Oh, you've been hurt before and now you don't trust anyone." I beg to differ. It's not a trust issue; it's a misunderstanding of the word itself.
It's lost in songs, poems and romantic comedies starring J-Lo.
It's lightly-dusted with exhaustion instead of smiles, giggles and that oogie feeling you get in your stomach. You get me, right? When you hear it said, it should sound like a song.
Where is the Boyz-II-Men, "End Of The Road," BabyFace "Whip-Appeal," "anything-by-Billie Holiday-love," that lies within my soul like powder, waiting for the right version of the word to 'add water and stir vigorously?' I'd drink THAT Kool-Aid and gladly leave that red, fruity ring around my lips.
I don't hate love and I'm not a cynic. I believe in love, but not that false love that weakens the actual word and meaning.
That word, diluted down to "love-flavored juice," slips too easily from our lips now. We use it an excuse, a shield, a distraction and we abuse it so much that when you hear it you automatically think, "yeah, right."
What happened to it? The word I mean. When did we start abusing that word? When did we start to believe that using it was a sign of weakness or for opportunity purposes only? When did the 'L' word become the doppleganger for destruction?
We only get so many real "I Love You-s" in this life, why waste them on games and deception?
Something is truly wrong when someone tells you they love you and you don't reciprocate, but instead, go numb. A friend told me, "Oh, you've been hurt before and now you don't trust anyone." I beg to differ. It's not a trust issue; it's a misunderstanding of the word itself.
It's lost in songs, poems and romantic comedies starring J-Lo.
It's lightly-dusted with exhaustion instead of smiles, giggles and that oogie feeling you get in your stomach. You get me, right? When you hear it said, it should sound like a song.
Where is the Boyz-II-Men, "End Of The Road," BabyFace "Whip-Appeal," "anything-by-Billie Holiday-love," that lies within my soul like powder, waiting for the right version of the word to 'add water and stir vigorously?' I'd drink THAT Kool-Aid and gladly leave that red, fruity ring around my lips.
Posted by
Introducing those who want things to happen to those who can MAKE things happen!
at
11:19 PM
No comments:
Labels: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow
diluted word,
love,
real love
Friday, November 12, 2010
Diversity & Contradiction
Okay, so I'm a short, black woman with big curly hair and a big butt. What does that have to do with the quality of my work? Apparently, quite a bit. I'm not surprised that veterans of journalism say that my personal branding or more specifically, my physical appearance will need to change if I want to be a Barbara or a Diane or a Katie. That's traditional thinking and also a logical fallacy. What bothers me more is that as I sat in class and the topic was discussed among the great minds of honor students and Master's students, I was surprised at how many of those great minds and future journalists also believed the same thing. I was a little angry at the way thinking HASN'T changed all that much and disappointed at the thought that I may have to work alongside or God forbid, under one of these 'great minds' who think that conformity is the best way to go. What is different or unique about yet another black woman journalist having to adapt a 'Miss Kentucky Pageant Bobbed-Haircut' in order to have a career in journalism? What is all of this talk about diversity if we are not willing to accept great journalists as they are and not as cookie cutter images sitting behind a desk or producing great news?
I had a couple of interesting conversations with two African-American women in that class. One told me that she just 'plays it safe' by wearing her hair straightened and another told me that I should first go out and make my name and then return to a hairstyle that not only celebrates me and my personality, but looks damn good? What are we learning in college? What is going to be different with these graduates that hasn't been done already? Why am I teaching my own daughter that hard work will speak volumes, when college is preparing it's students to go out and be sheep? Am I being too sensitive or too passionate? I accept that older people have problems with change, but lately it seems that younger people have already decided to go with the flow and worry about change later. Where is the diversity in that? Why can't I put on a suit and rock my big curly hair at the same time? Where do you draw the line once you start complying with the 'norm?'
I had a couple of interesting conversations with two African-American women in that class. One told me that she just 'plays it safe' by wearing her hair straightened and another told me that I should first go out and make my name and then return to a hairstyle that not only celebrates me and my personality, but looks damn good? What are we learning in college? What is going to be different with these graduates that hasn't been done already? Why am I teaching my own daughter that hard work will speak volumes, when college is preparing it's students to go out and be sheep? Am I being too sensitive or too passionate? I accept that older people have problems with change, but lately it seems that younger people have already decided to go with the flow and worry about change later. Where is the diversity in that? Why can't I put on a suit and rock my big curly hair at the same time? Where do you draw the line once you start complying with the 'norm?'
Posted by
Introducing those who want things to happen to those who can MAKE things happen!
at
11:16 AM
No comments:
Labels: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow
conformity,
contradiction,
diversity,
journalism
Sunday, July 18, 2010
Interracial Dating & Marriage
I recently read a blog about a black athlete with a new reality show where he's "looking for love." The controversial part of this is that he dismissed the sisters immediately. Rumor also has it that he didn't even want the sisters on his show to begin with and asked that they be released before the show went to air. No surprise there.
What I found hurtful and irresponsible were the men who posted comments in support of this and in their justification, made a lot of bullshitty comments about black women.
They stated that only black women have a problem with interracial dating & marriage. Oh really?
Lots of people; black, white and striped have a problem with it. Don't blame black women for that. Next, they call black women who want to date & marry athletes 'gold diggers,' along with a few more generalizations about ALL black women.
I'm gonna take a moment to exhale here before I start.
Okay.
How can ANY man, let alone a black man even TRY to speak about what black women feel, experience and want. We are individuals, so how can you lump us all into one group and label us in that manner?
I'll tell you what I've experienced from others in general when it comes to being a black woman; hate, betrayal, deception, disloyalty, blame, pain and lack of appreciation. I've also experienced love, joy and hope. I'm no victim, not by any means, but I happen to believe that black women are the most disrespected people on the face of this earth. A big reason for this is that [some of] our own men do it. That makes us an easy target for everyone else. We have few who will defend us.
Back to the subject. I have no problem with interracial dating and marriage. I wouldn't even be here had my ancestors not dared to fall in love and marry. I've dated outside my race too.
Here is MY problem; some of the black men who only date non-black women have a chip on their shoulder about it, so they justify their 'preference' by disrespecting black women.
Why? If you are satisfied with your choice, then why defend it at the cost of degrading your own race? Why defend it at all?
Not taking full ownership of your choice is the problem here!
You don't want to date or marry one of your sisters? That is your choice, but don't make it our fault. That is your bag to carry.
Next, the gold digger comment.
What woman, black, white or striped doesn't want to marry a rich man? Why is it that most of the time, black women receive that label?
We aren't worthy of having a rich hubby?
We aren't supposed to live well?
We aren't supposed to want to have a comfortable life?
I also question the reason SO MANY black men, especially rich black men, serial date or marry white women? It seems like they equate their own worth with what society views as worthy. Status maybe?
True love is a beautiful thing and I'll welcome it no matter what color he happens to be, but I will NEVER sell out my beautiful black brothers.
This subject is controversial, no doubt and there are bad apples in all races and both genders, but speaking as a black woman, I've had to fight 3x as hard for everything I have and want. Jobs, pay raises, promotions, respect from my co-workers are things I have to fight for because no matter how qualified I am and no matter how educated I am, I still have to deal with racism, but fighting the disrespect from my own brothers is something I shouldn't have to do.
I remember stories handed down through my ancestors about what happened to the women in our family during Slavery, Civil War, The Reconstruction, Indian Schools, Civil Rights Movement and more. Black women could be beaten & raped by a white man at any time and she would be blamed for it. Black women were accused of 'casting spells' on white men and deemed as sex-crazed creatures that white men were unable to defend themselves against. Our black men were beaten or killed if they dared to defend us.
Those stories hurt. They will always hurt.
So when [some] black men who date non-black women open their holes and spout logical fallacies that send us right back to what our ancestors had to endure, it hurts us. There's a difference in that hurt because they don't HAVE to relegate us, but they CHOOSE to do it anyway. They CAN defend us, but they CHOOSE not to.
Why do we have to pay such a high price because YOU have a 'preference?'
Thank you ancestors, thank you for being strong enough to endure, brave enough to accept the consequences, loving enough to stand together and smart enough to know bullshit when you hear it.
I'm out.
What I found hurtful and irresponsible were the men who posted comments in support of this and in their justification, made a lot of bullshitty comments about black women.
They stated that only black women have a problem with interracial dating & marriage. Oh really?
Lots of people; black, white and striped have a problem with it. Don't blame black women for that. Next, they call black women who want to date & marry athletes 'gold diggers,' along with a few more generalizations about ALL black women.
I'm gonna take a moment to exhale here before I start.
Okay.
How can ANY man, let alone a black man even TRY to speak about what black women feel, experience and want. We are individuals, so how can you lump us all into one group and label us in that manner?
I'll tell you what I've experienced from others in general when it comes to being a black woman; hate, betrayal, deception, disloyalty, blame, pain and lack of appreciation. I've also experienced love, joy and hope. I'm no victim, not by any means, but I happen to believe that black women are the most disrespected people on the face of this earth. A big reason for this is that [some of] our own men do it. That makes us an easy target for everyone else. We have few who will defend us.
Back to the subject. I have no problem with interracial dating and marriage. I wouldn't even be here had my ancestors not dared to fall in love and marry. I've dated outside my race too.
Here is MY problem; some of the black men who only date non-black women have a chip on their shoulder about it, so they justify their 'preference' by disrespecting black women.
Why? If you are satisfied with your choice, then why defend it at the cost of degrading your own race? Why defend it at all?
Not taking full ownership of your choice is the problem here!
You don't want to date or marry one of your sisters? That is your choice, but don't make it our fault. That is your bag to carry.
Next, the gold digger comment.
What woman, black, white or striped doesn't want to marry a rich man? Why is it that most of the time, black women receive that label?
We aren't worthy of having a rich hubby?
We aren't supposed to live well?
We aren't supposed to want to have a comfortable life?
I also question the reason SO MANY black men, especially rich black men, serial date or marry white women? It seems like they equate their own worth with what society views as worthy. Status maybe?
True love is a beautiful thing and I'll welcome it no matter what color he happens to be, but I will NEVER sell out my beautiful black brothers.
This subject is controversial, no doubt and there are bad apples in all races and both genders, but speaking as a black woman, I've had to fight 3x as hard for everything I have and want. Jobs, pay raises, promotions, respect from my co-workers are things I have to fight for because no matter how qualified I am and no matter how educated I am, I still have to deal with racism, but fighting the disrespect from my own brothers is something I shouldn't have to do.
I remember stories handed down through my ancestors about what happened to the women in our family during Slavery, Civil War, The Reconstruction, Indian Schools, Civil Rights Movement and more. Black women could be beaten & raped by a white man at any time and she would be blamed for it. Black women were accused of 'casting spells' on white men and deemed as sex-crazed creatures that white men were unable to defend themselves against. Our black men were beaten or killed if they dared to defend us.
Those stories hurt. They will always hurt.
So when [some] black men who date non-black women open their holes and spout logical fallacies that send us right back to what our ancestors had to endure, it hurts us. There's a difference in that hurt because they don't HAVE to relegate us, but they CHOOSE to do it anyway. They CAN defend us, but they CHOOSE not to.
Why do we have to pay such a high price because YOU have a 'preference?'
Thank you ancestors, thank you for being strong enough to endure, brave enough to accept the consequences, loving enough to stand together and smart enough to know bullshit when you hear it.
I'm out.
Posted by
Introducing those who want things to happen to those who can MAKE things happen!
at
6:33 AM
No comments:
Wednesday, July 7, 2010
Help Meet
Okay, so I DON'T know everything.
A recent conversation with a close friend introduced me to the term 'help meet.' I asked what it meant and I thought he was kidding me at first with his answer. I thought it sounded like some outdated archaic law that may or may not have been part of the original Bible. My backbone stiffened up and I refused to bend, but I wanted to understand my friend, because he's not the type of person to say things like that in a joking or derogatory manner.
Sooo, I went to Google and I found Genesis 2:18;
Then the Lord God said, "It is not good for the man to be alone; I make
him a helper suitable for him."
It didn't immediately hit me but it's sinking in now what he meant.
Have we really grown so far into independence that we think we can be alone? Why would we want to be alone? I'm not saying that we lower our standards or anything like that, but we were not meant to walk this life alone, right? I get it now.
I get that the years I spent alone, thinking I didn't need a man was wrong. I DO need that man. Women need men and Men need women, there's no weakness or shame in admitting that. I get that all the hard work I'm putting into this career change won't be half as gratifying without someone to share that success with. I really had to stop and put my own swagger in check.
I'm a 40-something year old single woman, never married. Many of those years I never lifted my head up to see what was there. I was determined to succeed even at the cost of never being in love or being married. As I get closer to to my goals, I see how foolish that was.
Nothing is a colder reminder than flying in from a 6 wk. trip abroad and there's no one there to greet you at the airport, no one holding up a sign with your name on it, grinning and waving, no one to hug you and tell you how much they love and missed you. That is the loneliest, most emptiest feeling and something I never want to feel again ever.
So we have Women's Lib? Women's Rights? Equal Rights for Women? All good things, heck better than good, great things, but did the definitions become subjective?
What is wrong with being a help meet? It entails being everything we want to be for our men anyway, does it not? Help meet doesn't equal doormat or a woman being subjugated by her husband.
I want to support the man I marry in any way I can, I want to be the reason he goes out each day and grinds, I want to be the reason he comes home everyday, I want to be the reason he can get up and deal with whatever problems come our way, I want to be standing right next to him and when necessary, behind him, I can let him be a man, I want to rub his back and kiss away the worry lines across his forehead, I want him to know that I will never abandon him, I want to have his back no matter what and I want to be with that man for the rest of our days in this life.
I don't believe in '50-50.'
Some days it will be 60-40, 70-30, 80-20 and 90-10.
Isn't that what it's all about? Sacrifice, harmony, love, trust and mutual respect for one another?
This is my confession and I gladly give it over to fate.
I'm out.
A recent conversation with a close friend introduced me to the term 'help meet.' I asked what it meant and I thought he was kidding me at first with his answer. I thought it sounded like some outdated archaic law that may or may not have been part of the original Bible. My backbone stiffened up and I refused to bend, but I wanted to understand my friend, because he's not the type of person to say things like that in a joking or derogatory manner.
Sooo, I went to Google and I found Genesis 2:18;
Then the Lord God said, "It is not good for the man to be alone; I make
him a helper suitable for him."
It didn't immediately hit me but it's sinking in now what he meant.
Have we really grown so far into independence that we think we can be alone? Why would we want to be alone? I'm not saying that we lower our standards or anything like that, but we were not meant to walk this life alone, right? I get it now.
I get that the years I spent alone, thinking I didn't need a man was wrong. I DO need that man. Women need men and Men need women, there's no weakness or shame in admitting that. I get that all the hard work I'm putting into this career change won't be half as gratifying without someone to share that success with. I really had to stop and put my own swagger in check.
I'm a 40-something year old single woman, never married. Many of those years I never lifted my head up to see what was there. I was determined to succeed even at the cost of never being in love or being married. As I get closer to to my goals, I see how foolish that was.
Nothing is a colder reminder than flying in from a 6 wk. trip abroad and there's no one there to greet you at the airport, no one holding up a sign with your name on it, grinning and waving, no one to hug you and tell you how much they love and missed you. That is the loneliest, most emptiest feeling and something I never want to feel again ever.
So we have Women's Lib? Women's Rights? Equal Rights for Women? All good things, heck better than good, great things, but did the definitions become subjective?
What is wrong with being a help meet? It entails being everything we want to be for our men anyway, does it not? Help meet doesn't equal doormat or a woman being subjugated by her husband.
I want to support the man I marry in any way I can, I want to be the reason he goes out each day and grinds, I want to be the reason he comes home everyday, I want to be the reason he can get up and deal with whatever problems come our way, I want to be standing right next to him and when necessary, behind him, I can let him be a man, I want to rub his back and kiss away the worry lines across his forehead, I want him to know that I will never abandon him, I want to have his back no matter what and I want to be with that man for the rest of our days in this life.
I don't believe in '50-50.'
Some days it will be 60-40, 70-30, 80-20 and 90-10.
Isn't that what it's all about? Sacrifice, harmony, love, trust and mutual respect for one another?
This is my confession and I gladly give it over to fate.
I'm out.
Posted by
Introducing those who want things to happen to those who can MAKE things happen!
at
6:18 AM
No comments:
Labels: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow
genesis 2:18,
Help meet,
love,
men and women,
relationships
Tuesday, July 6, 2010
American Men vs. European Men
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Posted by
Introducing those who want things to happen to those who can MAKE things happen!
at
4:34 AM
No comments:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
